Do film producers really need a film or entertainment lawyer as a professional practice? The prejudices of the entertainment host himself and, however, my collection of questions obviously gave a 100% chance to give a “yes” answer. The direct answer is “it depends on the situation”. Most producers today are film lawyers, entertainment lawyers, or other types of lawyers in their own right, so they can often represent themselves.
However, the filmmakers in question who act as if they are entertainment attorneys have no license or legal experience with entertainment attorneys to back them up. Filmmaking and film practice have unfortunately recently formed an industry where “vibes” and “explosives” replace real knowledge and experience. However, “falsified” documents and faulty production procedures never escape the trained eyes of entertainment lawyers working for studios, distributors, banks or negligence (E & O) insurance companies. For this reason alone, I think the work of filmmaking עורך דין and entertainment lawyers is still going strong.
Besides, I think there are always some lucky filmmakers
Who fly under the proverbial radar without the accompaniment of an entertainment host throughout the production process? They seem to avoid falls, and responsibilities such as bat flight are said to avoid people’s hair. For example, one of my best friends has not had health insurance for years and she is still healthy and floating financially – even this week. In general, some are always luckier than others, others are more likely to roll the dice than others.
But it’s very easy for pedestrians to say to themselves, “If you just be careful not to get into trouble, you’ll avoid the need for a movie lawyer.” Entertainment lawyers, especially in the field of film (or other) production, can be a real constructive asset for filmmakers and for the immunization of the filmmaker’s personal choice for potential liability. If the producer’s entertainment lawyer has experienced the filmmaking process before, the entertainment lawyer has already learned many of the harsh lessons that the commercial and film industry often take away.
Therefore, film and entertainment lawyers can save producers from many of these pitfalls.
How? Clear thinking, careful planning, and – this is a masterful, thoughtful and complete documentation of all filmmaking and related activities. Film lawyers should not be thought of as people trying to establish compliance. It is true that sometimes entertainment lawyers say “no”. However, entertainment lawyers can also be a positive force in a production.
Film lawyers can also help producers as effective business advisors in the legal representation process. If an entertainment lawyer is involved in several film productions, a film producer who hires a film lawyer’s entertainment lawyer will benefit from that accumulation of experience. Yes, it can be difficult to increase the film budget to allow for consulting, but professional filmmakers have fixed legal expenses, just like the fixed rental obligations of production offices. They tend to be seen as predictable and necessary. Or the cost of camera film. Some film and entertainment attorneys may set prices outside of the average price range of independent film producers, while other entertainment attorneys may not.
Enough generality. What specific tasks do producers typically need to hire film lawyers and entertainment lawyers?
Establishment or formation of “LLC”:
In other words, Michael Douglas’ Gordon Gecko character in the movie “Wall Street” when Bud Fox talks on the beach in the morning with a large mobile phone, the formation of this entity the problem usually consists of “a call for recovery” entertainment lawyers for film producers. Tell the movie producers it’s time. Entertainment lawyers say that if a producer does not create, file and maintain a corporation or other entity suitable for doing real business, then the film producer is not trying to protect that entity. increased. Film producers are potentially hurting themselves. Without the shield against liability that a company can provide, entertainment עורכי דין believe that a filmmaker’s personal assets (house, car, bank account, etc.) are at risk and, in the worst case scenario, in the end seized to make a film. Business debts and debts.